The Mahmud Abu Rayyah’s Contribution to The Development of Ulumul Hadith
Keywords:
Contribution; Mahmud Abu Rayyah; Ulumul HadithAbstract
This article explains about Mahmud Abu Rayyah and his contribution to the development of ulumul hadith. The book Adhwa' 'ala al-Sunnah al-Muhammadiyah written by Mahmud Abu Rayyah is the primary source in this research. Meanwhile, other writings related to Mahmud Abu Rayyah and his hadith thoughts are secondary sources. The research methods used in this article are qualitative research methods with the type of library research, documentation studies as data collection techniques, and analytical descriptive methods as data analysis methods. The results of the study show that Mahmud Abu Rayyah's contribution to the development of ulumul hadith is: First, cleaning the hadith and ulumul hadith from israiliyyat. Mahmud Abu Rayyah doubted the truth of israiliyyat and rejected its use in the study of hadith and ulumul hadith. Second, promoting a rational approach and a historical approach in the study of hadith and ulumul hadith. The two approaches that Mahmud Abu Rayyah often uses are very important in the development of ulumul hadith. Third, campaigning for the validity test of hadith through two stages, namely sanad criticism and matan criticism. Mahmud Abu Rayyah criticized hadith scholars who only attach importance to the criticism of sanad and ignore the criticism of matan. Matan criticism, in Mahmud Abu Rayyah's view, must also be carried out and be the final determinant of whether or not a hadith is shahih or not.
Downloads
References
Al-Dzahabi. (1985). Siyar A’lam al-Nubala. Al-Mu’assasah al-Risalah.
Al-Dzahabi. (1998). Tadzkirat al-Huffazh. Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyah.
Amelia Damayanti, S. Z. N. (2023). Contextualization of Early Marriage Hadith: Analysis of Marriage Hadith ’Aisha With Sociology Approach. International Journal of Research, 1(2), 1000.
Anam, W. (2016). Mahmud Abu Rayyah dan Kritisisme Hadis. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadis, 6(1), 1000.
Frianda, R. (2022). Kritik Terhadap Israiliyyat Dalam Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Terkait Kisah Nabi Adam. Perada: Jurnal Studi Islam Kawasan Melayu, 5(1), 1000.
Juynboll, G. H. A. (1999). The Authenticity of the Tradition Literature Discussions in Modern Egypt. Mizan.
Khan. M, N. A. (2021). The Role of Companions in Hadith Transmission. Journal of Islamic Tradition, 23(4), 1000.
Khon, A. M. (2011). Pemikiran Modern dalam Sunnah. Kencana.
Kuhn, T. S. (2002). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: Peran Paradigma dalam Revolusi Sains. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Makhfud. (2017). Meninjau Ulang Signifikansi Kedudukan Hadits dan Ingkar Al Sunnah. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 28(1), 1000.
Martono, F. (2024). Penyebaran Paham Ingkar Sunnah Modern (Motivasi, Tokoh, dan Sanggahan Terhadapnya). Dirayah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 4(2), 1000.
Munandar. (2019). Kritik Pandangan Mahmud Abu Rayyah Terhadap Tadwin Hadis. Shahih: Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam, 2(2), 1000.
Mursidin, I. I. (2022). Ingkar Sunnah (Argumen dan Tokohnya). Jurnal Ilmu Hadits, 1(1), 1000.
Nawawi, R. (2024). Analisis Kritik Mahmud Abu Rayyah terhadap Kredibilitas Abu Hurairah sebagai Perawi Hadis. Aqwal: Journal of Qur’an and Hadis Studies, 5(1), 1000.
Rahman. A, F. M. (2023). The Integrity of Hadith Narrators: Case Study of Abu Hurairah. Journal of Religious Studies, 48(1), 1000.
Rayyah, M. A. (n.d.). Adhwa’ ’ala al-Sunnah al-Muhammadiyah. Dar al-Ma’arif.
Ritzer, G. (2002). Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sofwan, N. (2019). Kontroversi Pemikiran Hadits Mahmud Abu Rayyah (Sebuah Kajian Kritis-Komparatif). Jurnal Al Ashriyyah, 5(1), 1000.
Wasman, Mesraini, S. (2023). A Critical Approach to Prophetic Traditions: Contextual Criticism in Understanding Hadith. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 61(1), 1000.
Yasin, M. (2020). Riwayat Israiliyyat Dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an; Asal-Usul dan Hukumnya. Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadits, 14(2), 1000.






